Breast Cancers linked to
EMF
Many people - women and men - are concerned about the growing numbers being
affected by breast cancer. Did you know that it can be caused by exposure to EMF radiation? You may be unwittingly
be exposing yourself to such risks every day.
State of the Evidence 2006:
What Is the Connection
between your Environment and Breast Cancer?
Published by Breast Cancer Fund and Breast Cancer Action
Abstracts from report herewith. You can download
your own from www.breastcancerfund.org
Note as shown: [Emphasis added is mine] and [One
connecting phrase my addition]
A PDF file of my Abstracts of the latest
News on protecting yourself against breast cancer can be obtained thru this link ... TLB
Breast Cancer Rpt 2006.pdf
Executive Summary
"Breast cancer rates have been climbing steadily in the United States
and other industrialized countries, amounting to more than 1,000,000 cases per year worldwide. In the United
States, a woman's lifetime risk of breast cancer has nearly tripled during the past 4 decades.
In 2005, an estimated 211,240 U.S. women were diagnosed with invasive breast
cancer and more than 58,000 women were expected to be diagnosed with one type of in-situ breast cancer, meaning the
tumor is confined to its original location in the breast.
In 2005, breast cancer was expected to kill more than 40,000 American women and more than 410,000 women worldwide.
The rate of new cases per year continues to inch upward in the U.S. even
though billions of dollars have been spent on breast cancer research.
Less than one out of every 10 cases occurs in women born with a genetic
predisposition for the disease, and as many as half of all breast cancers occur in women who have no known risk factors
for the disease.
The latest 2006 State of the Evidence report demonstrates that a significant
body of scientific evidence links exposure to radiation and synthetic chemicals to an increased risk of breast
cancer. It summarises the findings of more than 350 experimental, epidemiologic and ecological studies and
describes some of the ongoing controversies in breast cancer research.
The report recommends new directions for future research and includes a
10-point plan to act on the evidence and reduce human exposure to radiation [see below] and synthetic
chemicals. This plan is based primarily on the precautionary principle, which
in part states that indication of harm, not just proof of harm, is grounds for action.
Two decades of research on laboratory animals, wildlife and cell behavior
have shown the inadequacy of the long-held belief that "the dose makes the poison". Scientists now know
that the timing, duration and pattern of exposure are at least as important as the dose. Low-dose exposure to [low
frequency non-ionising radiation and] chemicals in the environment (parts per billion or even per trillion) during a
critical window of an organism's development can cause permanent damage to organs and systems.
We are all exposed to radiation and to
hundreds, if not thousands, of chemicals every day of our lives, yet we know very little about
the likely synergistic effects of these multiple exposures. Testing one exposure at a time for its
effects ignores this reality.
Patterns of breast cancer incidence indicate the importance of environmental
exposures. Women who move from countries with low breast cancer rates to industrialized countries soon acquire the
higher risk of their new country.
[Following are some items from the report citing EMF
radiation]
-
Occupational exposure to extremely
low-frequency electromagnetic fields was shown to increase breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women,
especially when exposure occurred before age 35. 73
-
A cluster of male breast cancers was reported among a small group
of men occupationally exposed to high electromagnetic fields. 74
-
An Italian study found that truck driving was the most frequent
occupation of male breast cancer patients with BRCA1 / BRCA2 mutations, possibly implicating exposure to PAHs. 75
-
A review of the epidemiologic literature on male breast cancer also
identifies exposure to EMFs and PAHs as risk factors. 76
"We ignore at our peril evidence that radiation
and chemicals are contributing to the growing human and economic cost of breast cancer. Halting the
scourge of this disease requires that we take action based on existing evidence to protect the health of people
and the planet. Waiting for absolute proof brings more needless suffering and loss of lives. It
is in our power to change the course we are on. It is time to act on the evidence.
A 10-Point Plan for Reducing the Risk of Breast
Cancer and Ultimately Ending the Epidemic:
4. Educate
the public about the health effects of radiation and how to reduce exposure to both ionizing and non-ionizing radiation.
..................
END abstracts of Executive Summary of report
"State of the Evidence 2006: What Is the Connection between your Environment and Breast Cancer?"
Would you like help with information on this Point 4 of the "Plan for
Reducing the Risk"?
I can provide you with very effective protection against the risk of non-ionising radiation (EMF).
Ask yourself these questions -
-
Do you regularly sit with a computer in front
of your chest - exposed to EMF radiation?
-
Do you stand in front of a terminal or
electronic device regularly?
-
Do you regularly have a wire conducting a EMF
radiation signal across your chest to your head? This also acts as an aerial attracting other EMF
fields nearby.
-
Do you regularly have a cellphone right next to
your vital organs, transmitting a microwave radiation signal every few milliseconds to register its
connection with the network? Do you put it next to your brain when you use it to
communicate?
-
Do you stand within metres of a microwave oven
or other EMF radiation source?
-
What more EMF radiation are you exposed to?
Take the test on this page of my website http://bioenergy.TimLeitch.net.nz/dangers/Your_exposure.htm
to see what your level of exposure may be.
The effect is measurable with a
bioenergy measuring instrument - see on my website
charts showing depletion of the human biofield caused by EMF radiation.
Everyone is affected in a similar way. Depleted bioenergy means your body is not able to function at its optimal
energetic state, your suffer EMF stress, compounding the effect of other daily stress, and your immune system is
compromised. Click this link ... Bioenergy/Human_Risks_Tests
My charts also show how this is remarkably overcome
with Biopro EMF Harmonisation chips and other protection products. These all make your body's energy system
more efficient and effective so boosting your energetic capability and your immune system.
This gives you protection against extraneous invisible EMF fields and aggressive transmitted pulsed radiation signals
(EMR) that you are frequently exposed to.
You can also further improve your body's vitality
and boost your bioenergy capability by always wearing a
Biolife pendant and re-energising all liquids you drink and high moisture content foods you eat with the
remarkable new Biopro Smart Card. There are charts showing typical
measurements of the benefit from these on my website, too. Click these links ...
Bioenergy/Biolife Pendant and Bioenergy/Smart
Card
You don't just have to believe me. I am happy to measure your own
bioenergy should you require your own proof. Just give me a call to see what we can arrange.
I recommend the use of Biopro Technology because I am convinced that really
it does provide a New Generation of Wellness to allow you to avoid
the adverse effects of what is growing to be the modern global epidemic of
electropollution.
You can now protect yourself, and those you care about, from this significant
health hazard that continues to grow in our increasingly technological world. Take positive action to get this vital
protection for your health and safety now.
I look forward to helping you reduce your EMF exposure risk and protect your
bioenergy.
Sincerely,
Tim Leitch
Tim Leitch Bioenergy
A PDF file of my Abstracts of the latest News on protecting yourself
against breast cancer can be obtained thru this link ... TLB
Breast Cancer Rpt 2006.pdf | 
