|
Research at the Safe Wireless Initiative, focuses on the mechanisms
of harm at the cellular and molecular level so far as living beings are concerned. This is by far a
more practical approach than focussing on the diseases that may be the result of the exposures, per se.
By focusing on the harm-causing mechanisms, we can also see where and how certain types of intervention
technologies might work.
Here are summary points concerning mechanisms of harm.
Mechanisms of harm
-
Information carrying RF (radio frequency) waves trigger the cell
membrane protective response which leads to harmful effects.
-
Specific types of damage occur inside the cell. There is
increased free-radical concentration that leads to both disruption of DNA repair (micronuclei) and cellular
dysfunction. When the cell loses its function, it goes through apoptosis (programmed cell death).
In apoptosis, the micronuclei formed from the disrupted DNA repair are released into nutrient rich
interstitial fluid and they are free to clone and proliferate -- that is the most likely cancer mechanism.
- Specific damage occurs to proteins on the cell membrane; the effect is that intercellular communication is
compromised. Cells can't talk to each other and that damages tissue, organ and organism function.
Almost all of the acute and chronic symptoms seen in electrosensitive
patients can be explained in some part by disrupted intercellular communication.
These mechanisms explain the wide scope of problems we observe
following EMR exposure -- from learning and sleep disorders to birth defects and cancer.
The mechanisms also explain why gross measures like blood microscopy
and thermograms suggest improvement. The interventive effect occurs at the cellular level, but it is
manifested at the tissue, organ and organism levels. Without a mechanistic underpinning, the
{interventive} effects seen at the organ level (e.g. blood microscopy) have no biological grounding and are thus
subject to speculation. There is much more information gleaned when we begin at the mechanism and work
outward rather than the other way around.
Mechanisms for intervention
SWI follows the Public Health Paradigm in its intervention
work. This entails 3 progression stages.
-
Primary intervention technologies are those that act to prevent
the cell membrane protective response from being inappropriately triggered. These act on the
"cause" of the problems and include: headsets, active noise field technology (developed by the
U.S. military) and passive noise field technologies.
-
Secondary intervention technologies are those that act to restore
intercellular communication and thus can ameliorate the "effects" of the exposure to EMR.
These are most effective in conjunction with primary interventions and include: subtle energy technologies,
diodes, and some pendants.
- Tertiary intervention technologies are those that act to rehabilitate and correct cell damage. These
work only in conjunction with primary and secondary intervention technologies and include: nutritionals,
anti-oxidants and repair supplements.
Contraindications
In our work, we are noting that it is sometimes dangerous to the
patient to use secondary or tertiary preventives in the absence of concurrent primary intervention. If the
intercellular communication is restored by artificial means while significant physical or chemical damage to the
cell membrane continues to occur, cell membranes become "imprinted" with information chronically
limiting gap-junction communication. In short, the cell membranes become "lazy".
We are learning as we go along, but we remain in the learning
phase. As more information becomes available, we will continue to pass it along.
Dr G. L. Carlo
Director, Safe Wireless Initiative
http://www.safewireless.org |
